kindle ↠ Blood Sisters à 434 pages Download Á Sarah Gristwood

Sarah Gristwood ´ Blood Sisters book

kindle ↠ Blood Sisters à 434 pages Download Á Sarah Gristwood Û [BOOKS] ✴ Blood Sisters ✻ Sarah Gristwood – Dogsalonbristol.co.uk From best selling historian Sarah Gristwood comes the true story behind Philippa Gregory’s recent novels – the women who gave birth to the TuTe different These years were also packed with women's drama and – in the tales of conflicted maternity and monstrous births – alive with female energyIn this completely original book acclaimed author Sarah Gristwood sheds light on a neglected dimension of English history the impact of Tudor women on the Wars of the Roses She examines Cecily Neville the wife of Richard Duke of York who was deprived of being ueen when her husband died at the Battle of Wakefield; Elizabeth Woodville a widow with several So the women of the Wars of the Roses specifically Margaret Beaufort and Elizabeth Woodville Wydville have always held great interest for me A couple of thoughts1 This book is clearly meant as a popular history not an academic one It's meant for audiences who have some but not necessarily in depth knowledge of late medieval England I had an easier time keeping the names straight in Gristwood's work than I did in the first Wars of the Roses book I read another popular history by Alison Weir whose work I was warned against using while writing my undergraduate history for not being academic enough2 As a popular history it's done well eminently readable and making the women and their various personalities come alive It's perhaps a little odd that the 'Margarets' all share a strong forceful and occasionally overreaching nature while not popping out kids with the fecundity of the ElizabethsThere's enough of the little tidbits that make history entertaining in short it's the type of read that got me interested in history in the first place3 Unfortunately from an academic standpoint I cringed when looking at some of the sources Yes there were the appropriate primary sources and many sources that I have on my own bookshelf—but this latter is not necessarily a good thing I know the time period in uestion suffers from a lack of suitable sources but a couple of the works cited made me pause Then again this could just be the academic in me rearing my ugly headIn sum if you're interested in an entertaining read about the women who altered the course of England's history in the 1400s and early 1500s then you'll probably enjoy this If you're trying to write a paper for a class above the 100 or 200 level in undergraduate medieval or early modern English history your professor probably won't want you citing this

doc è Blood Sisters ´ Sarah Gristwood

From best selling historian Sarah Gristwood comes the true story behind Philippa Gregory’s recent novels – the women who gave birth to the Tudor dynasty It is a fiery history of ueens the perils of power and of how the Wars of the Roses were ended – not by knights in battle but the sinewy political skills of womenThe events of the Wars of the Roses are usually described in terms of the men involved; Richard Duke of York Henry VI Edward IV and Henry VII The reality though argues Sarah Gristwood was ui Although the bickering between the Houses of York and Lancaster now known as the Wars of the Roses was heavily a “man’s world”; there were strong female players lurking in the shadows and controlling some strings Sarah Gristwood explores the links between Margaret of Anjou Cecily Neville Margaret Beaufort Elizabeth Woodville Elizabeth of York Anne Neville and Margaret of Burgundy Margaret of York in “Blood Sisters The Women Behind the Wars of the Roses”“Blood Sisters” is not merely a portrait of the events of the Wars of the Roses but a biography hepta biography? revealing the hidden links and worlds of the aforementioned key women The first section introduces these players and unveils information of interpersonal relationships which I was previously unaware of making “Blood Sisters” hearty at its beginning This also opens a new angle to learning about the Wars of the Roses and almost a behind the scenes look One can’t help but realize that these women had involvement than formally believedSadly this insight doesn’t extend to the individual women themselves as Gristwood mostly retells events versus bringing them alive or revealing the women’s psyche through any personal letterswritings Although this makes “Blood Sisters” academic on some level and heavy on facts; it also leads to many sections being too dry listless and overly political The average reader without strong interest in the topic may find “Blood Sisters” to be too heavy at times Oftentimes “Blood Sisters” lacks direction backtracks and is downright confusing not due to the topic but in regards to the writing Not only does Gristwood repeat herself enough times that it is noticeable but she also uses many “would have” and “could have” speculations sources such as anonymous poems and depends heavily on uotes from Shakespeare I thought we agreed that Shakespeare was NOT a historian? This lowers the scholarly feel and is distracting Also frustrating is Gristwood’s constant and I mean constant mention of “fortune’s wheel” when describing events turning in favor of one woman over another This happens several times on one single page and is simply uite annoyingSome of the women stick out and are vibrant than others such as Margaret Beaufort Whether this is due to personal bias on behalf of Gristwood or because sources are readily available I can not solidly deem This isn’t a positive or negative trait of “Blood Sisters” but is noticeable and worth noting as it may cause some readers to conclude that the work is uneven and chunky Even though “Blood Sisters” is of a history retelling without new information; there are some moments where Gristwood plays detective and presents compelling research or debunks some myths These perky moments add to the flesh of the book and keep the pace of “Blood Sisters” moving Another positive is that Gristwood doesn’t appear to have any major biases and doesn’t merely point fingers allowing the reader to make self decisions on who is to blame for whatThe highlight of “Blood Sisters” is without a doubt the climatic description of the Battle of Bosworth Gristwood’s coverage is exciting and descriptive This flows into a strong portrayal of Elizabeth of York and her relations with Margaret Beaufort in the early years of Henry VII’s reign As Elizabeth tends to be somewhat hidden in history Gristwood gives her ample due in “Blood Sisters” Also satisfying are the in depth theories relating to Perkin Warbeck’s background and motives Basically the last uarter of “Blood Sisters” is the strongest Although Gristwood makes firm statements which haven’t yet been proven; “Blood Sisters” is relatively up to date even mentioning the 2012 finding of Richard III’s body in a Leicester parking lot Sadly though “Blood Sisters” tends to otherwise use poorly sourced facts and annotations which dampen the academic value“The conclusion of “Blood Sisters” over reaches in attempts to be emotional and to tie the women of the book to Elizabeth I It felt a bit stretched and forced Overall “Blood Sisters” is a readable look at the Wars of the Roses with a uniue angle of the women involved—it merely has execution flaws My biggest complaint is that I didn’t really feel that I got to know these figures any than I already did and therefore didn’t feel the book was memorable or that Gristwood succeeded her goals of revealing these women Despite this “Blood Sisters” is great for a review of the Wars of the Roses or an introduction to the women involved

recipe

eBook Blood Sisters

Blood SistersChildren who married Edward IV in secret and was crowned ueen consort; Margaret Beaufort mother of Henry VII whose ambitions centred on her son and whose persuasions are likely to have lead her husband Lord Stanley previously allied with the Yorkists to play his part in Henry's victoryUntil now the lives of these women have remained little known to the general public Sarah Gristwood tells their stories in detail for the first time Captivating and original this is historical writing of the most important ki ‘Blood Sisters’ by author Sarah Gristwood aims to tell readers the true story of the Cousin’s Wars the Wars of the Roses from the point of view of the women involved Her seven case studies are Marguerite of Anjou the Lancastrian ueen; Elizabeth Woodville the Yorkist ueen; Cecily Nevill the would be Yorkist ueen and Elizabeth Woodville’s mother in law; Margaret of Burgundy Cecily’s youngest daughter who made an illustrious marriage to a duke; Margaret Beaufort Henry VII’s mother; Anne Nevill Richard III’s ueen and Elizabeth of York daughter of Elizabeth Woodville and daughter in law to Margaret Beaufort The aim of this work was to weave the seven lives and stories together into a narrative history teaching us that the Wars of the Roses were as much about the women as they were the menThe book is a good read well written in an easy to digest narrative of the period It clearly has a wide potential audience and I would say with confidence that you do not need any prior knowledge of the period to understand and enjoy this book Everything is clearly written and as a popular history there are not endless notes and citations Gristwood does uote from primary sources; when she does she tells us the author of her uote but not always the name of the writing and never the page numbers This might prove frustrating for people wanting to look at the sources for themselvesThe seven stories are interlinked nicely and the move from one woman to another is smooth and does not disrupt the author’s prose at all The women who I especially enjoyed in this book were Marguerite of Anjou and Elizabeth Woodville; their stories were covered well and rumours against them argued fairly Margaret Beaufort was treated well in the beginning but I thought the balance slipped towards the end of the book when she was discussed alongside Elizabeth of York That could just be me though Sadly even though Anne Nevill was one of the author’s case studies she does not feature much in the narrative That is of course not the authors fault; sources about Anne are scarceAs one would expect from a work of non fiction care was taken to be factually accurate and fair throughout One thing that did stick out was towards the end we had Edward of Warwick executed because the Spanish said so there was no mention of him plotting with Perkin Warbeck which actually is the crime he was executed forOn the whole this is a good book and I would recommend it to people interested in learning about the period